Skip to content

PubMed abstracts from September 2012 – to February 2013

Amidst the usual large number of opinion pieces of various weight, John Wiloughby – our PubMed reporter – found only one interesting article:“It caught my eye because it appeals to my prejudices – the rule of double effect can be viewed as a flimsy affair for more than the reason of ‘what did the medical team really intend – to relieve symptoms or to hasten death?’. It now appears that the philosophical distinction between ‘intended’ and ‘foreseen’ effects has been found wanting. Nice”. Find the abstract here.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp